My Reality Is Not Your Reality

by Debbie Hampton on May 31, 2012

Lately, I have found myself  frequently expressing to people that, while I respect their opinions and beliefs and am glad they have found what works for them in their lives, I believe differently and their views do not work for me.  What is “right” is what is right for them.  What is “right” is also what is right for me.

Maybe I am showing my naivete and evidence of living in my own world (which I will not dispute – read on), but I am truly shocked at the overwhelming number of people who want to impose their “right” beliefs on me.  I am also surprised at the many who take their subjective beliefs to be the irrefutable, unbiasied, singular truth.  Dictionary.com defines a belief as “something believed;  an opinion or conviction.”  It is not a fact of dubious authenticity.

There are very few things which are hard and true, indisputable facts in this world like the Earth is round, for instance.  This is a verifiable fact, right?  But, wait a minute!  It used to be believed that the Earth was flat and that ships could sail right off the end of it.  It also used to be believed that, after a few periods in early childhood, the brain was hard-wired.  It was printed in all the medical textbooks not too long ago.  We now know that this is not the case at all and that the brain is capable of change until the day a person dies.

So, even facts change.  They are only “right” until they are not “right” anymore.   What is “right” depends on the information available.

The information we have available to us, at the most basic level,  is merely our brains interpretation of some electrical signals.

Color is nothing more than cone cells in the retina being stimulated by light waves within a certain range of the spectrum. Because each of our brains are different, our perceptions of color are different.  The sky is blue, right?  No question.  However, your blue is different from my blue.   Maybe even very different.  Neither is right or wrong.  Both are blue.  Both are “right.” Your blue is just as blue to you as my blue is to me.  Both are simply our individual brains’ interpretation of the same signals.

Similarly, making sense of the world and the happenings within it is nothing more than our brains’ individual interpretations of the signals received as we go through our days interacting with our environments.  When giving meaning to these signals, our brains add memories, beliefs and attitudes about ourselves, others, and the world influenced by family, religion, school, culture and life experiences. Every spoken word we hear,  every written word we read, every experience we  have, absolutely everything, is always, always the product of our brain’s subjective interpretation of stimuli.

Hence, we all live in our own world which is our individual brain’s unique interpretation of the input it receives.  There is no single, uniform reality that is consistent among all of us.  Reality depends on what actually happens (objective) AND how our brains make sense of what happens (subjective).  Both are necessary components of reality, and reality is a subjective concept unique to each of us. While there are many commonalities across all of our realities, it cannot be assumed that everything is the same for all of us or even remotely close to it.

Brain research is proving this without a doubt.  Each of us experience the world uniquely influenced by our physical brain function, our past memories and experiences as well as present conditions.  People see what they expect to see and remember what they expect to remember because of their brain’s perceptual bias.  (For more information on this, see blog post Shades of Gray.) .

Even seeing something with your own eyes is not necessarily “the truth.” If three different people witness a single event, there are going to be three accounts of it which can sometimes vary greatly. Research is proving that our memories are not reliable recordings of what actually happened.  Our memories are imperfect copies of the past colored by our brain’s perception.  A memory is only as accurate as the last time it was remembered.  (For more information on this, see blog post The Lies of the Past.)

Quantum physics is further confirming the idea of there not being one, consistent reality.  Experiments have determined that subatomic particles, which comprise all matter,  are not even solid, stable objects.  They are vibrating, indeterminate packets of energy that cannot be understood or defined in isolation.  They are schizophrenic, sometimes behaving like a wave and sometimes like a particle and sometimes even behaving like both AT THE SAME TIME.  They only ‘collapse’ into a set state upon the instance of being observed.  (For more information on this, see blog post In Two Places at Once.)

Given the above information, I have a very hard time understanding how anyone can tell me what I should believe or what is right.  We don’t even have the same realities. “Right” is whatever is right for an individual based on their unique brain. Of course, to live in a civilized society, we have laws which are really just beliefs upon which the majority agree.  For this reason, laws vary in different cultures.

The need to be right denotes inflexible and limited thinking.  Taking a position of being right assumes superiority and judges the other person.  For you to be right, someone has to be wrong.  Needing to be right is always an invitation for conflict and a misuse of efforts, I believe.  The energy one uses to prove their “right-ness” and to influence others could be put to better, more positive use.  I once read an analogy of this where two deer were standing on railroad tracks arguing about the right direction in which to go.  While they were arguing, a train ran over them.

Giving up the need to be right and being more open-minded can lead to a happier, more peaceful life and allow many opportunities for growth and learning. Not needing to be right can make a person more humble and a better listener.  A person who does not have any identity or value invested in being right can live life not being afraid to make mistakes and can laugh more easily at themselves.  When a person is secure with a strong sense of self, they feel no need to be right because a differing view is not a threat.

At any time, I can only speak and decide for myself about what is right FOR ME within my brain’s reality.  I was told recently by someone who I do not live in the “real” world.  My world is just as real to me as theirs is to them and neither is right or wrong – only different.

It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see. ― Henry David Thoreau

 

{ 33 comments… read them below or add one }

Kathy May 31, 2012 at 11:06 am

Hi Debbie,

Thanks for a thought-prompting article. It reminded me of something I saw on YouTube recently. David Eagleman is a neuroscientist. In this clip he talks about his theory of “Possibilianism.” Not so much a theory I suppose as a way of thinking. It’s about 20 min long and well worth the time investment. After reading your article I wonder if this will resonate with you as it did with me:

http://www.poptech.org/popcasts/david_eagleman_on_possibilianism

Reply

Debbie Hampton May 31, 2012 at 12:08 pm

Kathy, thanks for commenting. I love, love, love David Eagleman. His book, Icognito, is fantastic. I have seen the clip before. In it, he tells of the Hubble telescope focusing on an “empty” patch of space. They discovered TEN THOUSAND galaxies in what looked to be black space. Findings like this further convince me that I cannot even begin to presume that I know anything for sure – for me or anyone else. There is always the possibility of anything. It is fun and interesting to keep an open mind about everything, I think.

Reply

Stephen Gemmell May 31, 2012 at 2:41 pm

Hey Debbie, thanks for another fascinating post. For me, reality is an attachment, a sense of belonging or knowing. When the ego gets too agitated then, yes, the insistence of being right takes over. Your Thoreau quote reminds me of the first post I read when I came across your blog a couple of years ago – the one with video of the basketball players and the gorilla. Yep, there are none so blind as those that cannot see. Take care, Stephen

Reply

Debbie Hampton May 31, 2012 at 9:59 pm

Stephen…have not heard from you in a while. Hope you are well.

Interesting. I had not thought about what part the ego plays in this. A large part, no doubt. I think, when someone feels no need to feed the ego, there is no need to be right. Right?!? :)

Reply

Vishnu May 31, 2012 at 5:45 pm

I completely disagree with everything you say here, Debby:)

Lol, kidding of course. We each have our own reality – why spend our lives trying to convince others we are right or our point of view is best. I tend to do that because of my legal background but trying hard to stop! Life’s too short and convincing others is usually a futile and frustrating experience. We may each not live in the “real world” but we live in our own worlds and that reality is what works for me:)
Vishnu recently posted..21 Phrases People Who Resist Taking Action Use

Reply

Debbie Hampton May 31, 2012 at 6:09 pm

Vishnu, I expected some differing opinions and challenges with this one! I have had some in Facebook comments…which, I think, only exemplify the message in the post. That some people feel the need to be “right.”

As long as no one is getting murdered or no laws are being broken, (They indicated I was suggesting that the Holocaust was “right” because it was the manifestation of some people’s beliefs.) can’t they believe what works for them and I believe what works for me? Can’t we all just get along?!

Reply

Judy M. Hampton June 1, 2012 at 8:41 am

Well done, darling daughter. You have truly posted one of the best blogs EVER! Many discussion lately concerning this very subject and it all harks back to Live and Let Live ! Also, the golden rule is a very appropriate guide for living. I applaude you for this brave and heartfelt expression of your beliefs and wish others would follow your example. As always, lots of love, your Mom

Reply

Debbie Hampton June 1, 2012 at 9:13 am

Mom, thanks for you encouragement and support. Without all the neuroscience and quantum physics, you summed it nicely in the saying “live and let live!” Precisely!

Reply

Penn June 1, 2012 at 8:52 am

Hi Sis,

Love the article… and, here’s my “belief” or occasional experience, if you will, about this…

The transcendent experience of the razor’s edge of Zen, for example, occurs at the junction of subjective and objective reality.

In the clarity of this experience, the maya of subjective reality, the perceptions which we impose upon the world, drop away. The veils are rent, and Reality, in it’s objective glory, is revealed to the unencumbered mind. Mind at this point is not individual, it is a collective experience, beyond subjectivity, revealed as soul.

Cheers,

Penn

Reply

Debbie Hampton June 1, 2012 at 9:19 am

I am going to have to read, re-read, and think over your response! I couldn’t even grasp it the first time through! :)

It is an interesting point you make which I never thought about is that where the subjective and objective meet is transcendence. Hmmmm. I like thought of that. And, of the collective experience being beyond subjectivity.

Thanks for giving my mind something to chew on. You are always good for that. :)

Reply

Sandra / Always Well Within June 5, 2012 at 2:49 pm

Debbie,

You given us so much to reflect on in this article! I’ve been touched by this reality recently myself: that we all living in our own – sometimes very small – worlds defined by our perceptions. Does this ever lead to a sense of feeling disconnected for you?
Sandra / Always Well Within recently posted..The Power of “Yes, But…” to Catapult You to Clarity

Reply

Debbie Hampton June 5, 2012 at 5:55 pm

Sandra, I tend to live a life that is very much in isolation anyway. While this can contribute to that, I think that the awareness of this can also can make me feel more connected knowing that we are all living in our own unique perceptions of reality, if that makes any sense.

Reply

Linda June 13, 2012 at 7:24 pm

Sandra, you may feel disconnected to some people out there, but this always gives you the chance to connect in other ways, through service to people for example. I feel more connected with the universe. I know everyone is connected to the universe also. So I feel that eventually most people will wake up, I wait for that day. The first rule of mindfulness is being centered within yourself. I think that Debbie’s writing of reality is just that. Realizing that you are one person, we all have different ways of looking at things and different beliefs. But in the end there is a commonality among all of us we need to tap into to continue on this planet.

Reply

Trevq June 16, 2012 at 1:10 pm

I have heard bits and pieces in this article before, but never considered how they all added up. The amazing thing to me is, that its so hard to accept there is no right or wrong. I have fought this in myself for decades now. It was never from a I am better than you mentality…I just assumed I was always wrong… as I never seemed to agree with the majority of people around me about anything. So I figured I was broken, stupid, or lacking in some major way. Turns out I just live in a different world after all… as its mine and mine alone.
I feel like there is almost a break through in my understanding and peace is possible in my “Soul” after all.

Thank you for your blog, time and effort to share your thoughts with others. I am going to read your blog now as long as you do one, which I hope is forever as I enjoy your articles very much.
“forever as in as long as you live and I am around to read it”

Reply

Debbie Hampton June 16, 2012 at 3:24 pm

Trevq, I am so glad to hear that this resonated with you and glad it allowed you to make a break through in your thinking. Your reality, your perspective, and your opinions are just as valid as anyone else’s. There is no right or wrong…only different.

Please be aware of how you talk to yourself. This, too, shapes your reality. Practice kindness and compassion with yourself. By changing this, you can change your reality. A couple of blogs I want you to read: http://www.thebestbrainpossible.com/seeing-the-world-through-rose-colored-glasses http://www.thebestbrainpossible.com/everybody-is-a-genius http://www.thebestbrainpossible.com/thought-inventory-what-thoughts-are-you-feeding-your-brain

Oh and thank you for the kind words. I will try to live up to espousing wisdom. Can’t always guarantee it, but I can garantee that I will share what I have learned through my own challenges. Blessings to you.

Reply

Trevq August 1, 2012 at 8:12 pm

Thank you again, your site has been a blessing to myself and many others. I hope to one day be as enlightened and self aware as yourself have shown to be. I take it a day at a time, and with examples such as yourself in the world makes it a joy to strive towards the goal!

Reply

Debbie Hampton March 18, 2013 at 8:29 pm

I do not think of myself as enlightened and self aware. I work zt it every day, just like anyone else. It is a continual challenge. Some days I do well. Some days, not so gooed.

But I will say this: I am leaps and bounds beyond where I was! If I can do it, anyone can! :) So, keep going! Being mindful makes the journey so much richer along the way!

Reply

Bret McLaughlin July 8, 2012 at 10:28 pm

What a well-written article — clearly you’ve got some serious mental horsepower. I wonder if your solitary lifestyle (as you mentioned earlier) might be leading you to miss two important nuances of the discussion:

1. Sometimes there IS a right answer.
The world is not flat. The moon is not made out of cheese. I think these cases are a tiny minority of the typical “right/wrong” cases that people discuss (I had trouble thinking of examples!), but sometimes there is a right answer, I think.

2. Sometimes people can be persuaded.
Even if each of us has our own intrinsic beliefs of what is right, that doesn’t mean that it’s pointless to discuss viewpoints. At one point or another, even the most stubborn of us has been persuaded to change our definition of right. We can all grow, learn and change — so it’s not pointless to try to convince someone to change their beliefs.

3. Sometimes by “right” we often mean “most right.”
Society has to define rules, on some level: we have no choice, unless we want society as we know it to totally break down. Yet, no facet of society is “right” by everyone’s standards. Whether it’s national healthcare, drunk driving or even pedophilia, there will never be 100% consensus on what is right. So sometimes even if something isn’t “right” for everyone, it should still be done for the common good.

I wonder if the art of a functioning society is one in which its people can agree which rules fall into categories 1, 2 and 3.

Anyway, you should totally listen to me — I know I’m right! :P

Reply

Debbie Hampton July 8, 2012 at 11:07 pm

Bret, thank you for your comment with its encouraging words and well thought out points. I love hearing that I have “mental horsepower” …even after my brain injury! In response to your points:

1) Yes, there clearly are some things which are black or white with no ambiguity – for now – based on our understanding and interpretation of the information available to us. These are not usually going to be things about which people have very differing opinions. Our perspective, understanding and the information changes. “Right” is only as correct as the current information available. The world was thought to be flat. Flat was “right” for a long time. Right is only right until it is not right anymore. Even facts thought to be definitively right can and have changed many times over the years.

2) Just because people can be persuaded does not make anything right. I did not say it is pointless to discuss viewpoints. I just cannot respect anyone who insists that their view is the only one and is “right”. It is right for them. It may be right for me, but it is up to me with my unique perspective and brain to decide that.

3) I absolutely agree with your last point that we usually mean “most right” when saying “right”. Substituting “most right” in the first point above works for me!

You are absolutely right …..and so am I! :) (Isn’t it nice how that works?!)

Reply

Bret McLaughlin July 8, 2012 at 11:44 pm

I think that black-and-white issues can be slippery, too. Maybe that’s the problem: It’s so easy for us to consider things obvious, even when we meet someone who considers the opposite opinion “obvious”, too! Consider homosexuality.

Some people would classify it as behavioral in nature, like littering or spanking children, and say that it’s wrong and must be discouraged. Others, like me, believe it’s an intrinsic brain mapping, like being left-handed — where discouraging it is downright cruel.

My gut instinct is that this is a brain issue, and that the other side is kidding themselves. I’ve tried to cite studies demonstrating this with my more conservative family members, but it does little to persuade.

So things brings up an interesting moral dilemma: Should I stick to my guns that this is a factual, black-and-white issue? Or should just acknowledge that my “right” isn’t their “right”?

Reply

Debbie Hampton July 9, 2012 at 9:29 am

Bret, there is much evidence to suggest that homosexuality is a biological issue. This is a subject of special interest to me and I hope that attitudes will change here. However, I cannot force anyone to change their thinking and I feel that trying to convince someone is a misuse of my time and energy. I prefer to put my efforts , in this situation ans all others, towards “being the change I want to see.”

In this way, I am not imposing my “right” on anyone else who believes just as firmly in their “right”. It also allows me to feel as if I am doing something positive to evolve attitudes and perceptions without judging others.

Be the change. It works in all situations.

Blog I wrote about this: http://www.thebestbrainpossible.com/be-the-change

Reply

shane July 9, 2012 at 11:10 pm

Well, I’m sorry but you are wrong. Here is why:

“I do remember one formative influence in my undergraduate life. There was an elderly professor in my department who had been passionately keen on a particular theory for, oh, a number of years, and one day an American visiting researcher came and he completely and utterly disproved our old man’s hypothesis. The old man strode to the front, shook his hand and said, “My dear fellow, I wish to thank you, I have been wrong these fifteen years”. And we all clapped our hands raw. That was the scientific ideal, of somebody who had a lot invested, a lifetime almost invested in a theory, and he was rejoicing that he had been shown wrong and that scientific truth had been advanced.” – Richard Dawkins

We should not strive to be people who cannot bear to be told we are wrong, we should strive to be people who thank others for proving us wrong.

Reply

Debbie Hampton July 10, 2012 at 8:41 am

Your reality is not my reality.

Reply

laurie March 18, 2013 at 7:20 pm

o my – there is so much that is wrong with this article. This is the kind of thinking that leads to someone telling me that “they respect my opinion, but disagree” when I present them with facts that they do not like or care to think about because it goes against their idealized version of the world. Not everything is an opinion or interpretation. And yes, the sky is blue because that is the way we have defined blue and have some knowledge of the way human eyes work – those are facts. If your eyes see a slightly different shade of blue, well, it is still blue, not red. There is a range of variation we work in. If everyone has their own reality, it leads to a moral codes also being negotiable (their own realities!), and so in some people’s opinion, it is okay to so something like murder someone else. There ARE differences between right and wrong, and facts and beliefs – it is NOT what what I believe is right!
Shane – your end quote is great. Trained as a scientist, I fear the world is going back to the dark ages.

Reply

Debbie Hampton March 18, 2013 at 8:34 pm

All I can say, Laurie, is that I respect your opinion, but I disagree. I feel no need to convince you that I am “right.” You have your reality which is true for you and I have mine.

I do say in the blog:
“Of course, to live in a civilized society, we have laws which are really just beliefs upon which the majority agree. For this reason, laws vary in different cultures.”

Even as a trained scientist, you might benefit by giving up your need to be right.

Reply

Anonomum July 22, 2012 at 3:59 pm

An excellent blog. It reminded me of a story they tell in yoga where 5 brothers all wore blindfolds and stood infront of an elephant. Their father asked them to describe the animal infront just by their touch. They all disagreed: one saying it was long and tall, another like an octopus, another etc. The same elephant but from different experiences (of blindness interestingly).

Reply

Debbie Hampton July 22, 2012 at 5:14 pm

Exactly! I love your example. We only know what our experience is. Someone else’s experience of anything is going to be totally different because it is interpreted by their brain. Neither one is right or wrong or encompassing of the whole picture. How do we even know what the whole picture is or how any one else “should” experience it?

Reply

Robert Bommicino August 9, 2012 at 4:55 pm

Good article Debbie!
Reality just IS…it’s our perceptions that are variable. “The information we have available to us, at the most basic level, is merely our brains interpretation of some electrical signals.” I think this is basically belief. I am grateful to anyone who proves my belief wrong. I can advance my thinking… It’s the Need to be ‘right’ that’s the problem….
We tend to decide on what we already believe… confirmatory bias…people favor information that confirms their beliefs and attitudes while discounting ambiguous or unfounded or fallacious evidence as supporting their belief. They become overconfident in their belief even in the face of this contrary evidence. If scientific proof exists that proves their belief false it doesn’t matter to them, they’ll still cling to their belief….this is the same thinking that drives superstitions, divine revelations and the like. Desired conclusions are more likely to be believed true…

Reply

Debbie Hampton March 18, 2013 at 8:38 pm

Robert, thank you for commenting. You are so “right!” :) We look for evidence confirming what we already believe and tend to disregard that which contradicts our beliefs.

I, too, am grateful to be shown a different perspective. I won’t say wrong because, I believe, there really is no “right” or “wrong.” I love to be shown new colors! :)

Reply

Scott March 19, 2013 at 1:28 pm

“The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.” ― William Shakespeare, As You Like It

I’ve also heard that the fewer beliefs you have, the happier you are. Beliefs are attachments, which lead to suffering when they’re “messed with.”

Reply

Debbie Hampton March 19, 2013 at 4:15 pm

Scott, I love both of your statements and couldn’t agree more!

Reply

Ronald May 24, 2013 at 5:20 am

Bla bla bla, inspired bla bla bla, but still just bla bla bla. Can you grasp the depth of this comment?

Bliss

Reply

Debbie Hampton May 24, 2013 at 8:46 am

I’ll have to give that one some thought. :)

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: